One but Different

While many can resonate with the idea of unity in diversity, there could also be some reservations. How do we reconcile theological differences between paths that supposedly stem from the same source? How can we overlook striking contradictions in the various accounts of history and culture? Could this be a naive ‘new age’ attempt to avoid confrontation and create peace, harmony and unity? Without more explanation, some may say it’s a case of being politically correct, but theologically wrong. When trying to reconcile ‘differences’ between religions, here are some points to consider:

Context – religious scriptures and statements must be understood in relation to the entire body of teachings, and with due consideration of the social milieu within which they were presented. ‘Differences’ may be perceived because we adopt a one-dimensional approach i.e. taking statements simplistically, without understanding the context, purpose and background behind them.

Emphasis – different traditions and teachers may stress different things. Our spiritual evolution requires significant refinement of character and consciousness, and different religions may well work on different aspects of this. Thus, they may emphasise different points, but such ‘differences’ are a part of a broader harmony and master plan.

Interpretation – we understand the divine traditions through the representatives of that faith. While this is perfectly natural, the teachers have to prove themselves as transparent and free from the propensity to insert their own ideas. ‘Differences’ may well surface because we take human opinions to be gospel truths.

Authority – any religious claims must be traceable back to the original texts. In today’s world, much confusion ensues due to a lack of reference to authentic scripture. People claim to speak for a tradition yet offer no reference point for their presentation. Thus, ‘differences’ may well be due to inaccurate and erroneous presentations.